Economic
progress is often used to measure a country's success. However, some people believe that other factors
are more important. What other factors should also be considered when measuring
a country's success? Do you think one factor is more important than others?
The
relative success of different
countries is usually defined in economic terms. There are several other factors, apart from the economy, that could be used to assess a country, and in my opinion education is the most
important of all.
Standards of
education, health and individual human rights should certainly be considered
when measuring a country’s status. A good
education system is vital for the development of any nation, with schools,
colleges and universities bearing the responsibility for the quality of future
generations of workers. Healthcare provision is also an indicator of the
standard of living within a country,
and this can be measured by looking at average life expectancy rates or
availability of medical services. Finally,
human rights and levels of equality could be taken into account. For example, a
country in which women do not have the same opportunities as men might be
considered less successful than a country with better gender equality.
In my view, a country’s education system should be seen as the most important
indicator of its success and level of development. This is because education has a considerable effect on the other two factors mentioned
above. It affects people’s health in the sense that doctors and
nurses need to be trained, and scientists need to be educated to the highest
levels before they can carry out medical research. It also affects the economy in the sense that a
well-educated workforce will allow a variety of companies and industries to
flourish, leading to trade with other countries, and increased wealth.
In conclusion,
nations can be assessed and compared in a variety of ways, but I would argue
that the standard of a country's education system is the best measure of its
success.
(288 words, band 9)